Severodonetsk, conflict with the patrol police
Locality: Сєвєродонецьк
Address: Bogdan Lishchina Street, 38
Added: 2020-12-15 09:25:00
Status:
Resolved is suspended
On 13.12.2020, two events involving patrol police took place in Severodonetsk, which received a wide response among residents of the city.
1.detention of a driver who drove through an intersection at a yellow traffic light and a witness who was filming a video of the detention. The police used physical force and handcuffs to detain both men. It should be noted that there is no full video of the incident from the police. The network has installation from scraps. As it was noted in order to manipulate public opinion and justify the behavior of patrol officers. This was stated by representatives of the media and the public sector on the television program "why so?"on the Donbass online TV channel. The presenter noted that representatives of the patrol police refused to come to the live broadcast and motivated it by "heavy employment". The video from the Internet shows that the car passed through a yellow traffic light, then the recording continues with the fact that the police and a common-law Man are already arguing and ends with a detention with the use of force. On the video of the detention of the witness who filmed the incident, it is difficult to understand why force was used against the man and detention in general. From the speech of the press secretary of the patrol police department, it can be concluded that both men were detained for using obscene language in a public city, which was regarded as a violation of public peace. Studying the comments on social networks, it can be stated that the reaction of the population is the same regarding the methods of detention and is sharply negative. But regarding the intersection on yellow, opinions were divided into two parts. Some consider this a violation and support the police in imposing fines. Others – that it is impossible to draw conclusions on those fragments of the record that is available on the network. And the driver claims that he completed the maneuver, which is not a violation of traffic rules.
2.an official car collided with the car of a resident of the city. As a result, the car was thrown about 20 meters along the sidewalk. The comment of the police press secretary regarding this event from the point of view of the population has false information. The spokeswoman said that the patrol was going to help another crew and blue and red beacons were turned on on the cars, and a sound siren was working. But witnesses claim that the sound signal was turned on for a few seconds after the collision. The population also expresses negative assessments on this issue. Another participant in the accident gave a rather brief comment on the incident. It says that he is waiting for the results of the investigation and the court's decision. Readers of social networks noted that violations of traffic rules by the police are systematic. Comments under FB posts regarding these events consist of many stories of violations of the law and abuse of authority by the patrol police. Some of these examples and thoughts were supported by the guests of the studio of the program "why so?». And one of the stories was told on the air and left a link to the video. Negative and obscene statements about patrol officers are found in every post about their work. This fact was revealed during the monitoring of public posts and comments in social networks.